What Exactly Is A Hologram?
And More Importantly, A Holographic Pattern?
Mystics have long held that there is a Divine Pattern of Creation that is holographically replicated into each of the parts. This is expressed in the Genesis account of Creation in the words: "So God created man in his own image, in the image of God he created him; male and female he created them." That man was Created in the image and likeness of God, means that all that is within God, is also within each of us -- and this hologrpahic reality has further been expressed in the words: As Above, So Below -- and what is true of the Macrocosm, is also true of the microcosm. And when rightly understood, all of Creation is imbued with the polarities of male and female -- and what is called the Third-Force balance of Mind which has been portrayed as the Logos -- and as the offspring of Mother/Father Creator-God, often referred to as the Son of God. The ancient wise men understood the Trinity to be the embodiment of Mother/Father God -- and the Third-Force Balance which was the Logos or Mind of God. Mystics have long embraced the pattern of Duality of all of Creation -- and the Doctrine of the Trinity is merely a representation of the All-Pervading Male/Female Pattern, along with the Third-Force Balance of Mind. And that this Divine Pattern is holographically replicated into all of Creation -- and that man and woman has the innate potential to become One with the Logos or Mind of God -- is the basis and foundation of all the world's religions.
The Tree of Duality (aka The Tree Of Knowledge Of Good And Evil) that brings death to the eater thereof, is representative of the division of male and female -- while the Tree of Life is representative of the Third-Force Balance that re-merges the proverbial Adam and Eve into a Transformed Oneness on a Higher Plane of Reality. In the allegorical account of Genesis after eating the forbidden fruit of the Tree of Duality it is stated that: "The man has now become like one of us, knowing good and evil. He must not be allowed to reach out his hand and take also from the tree of life and eat, and live forever" (Gen 3:22-23). But, in order to eat the fruit of the Tree of Life, man must overcome his own divided nature. And in the important teachings of the Gospel that was suppressed by the later Church, what this amounted to was the process of overcoming the division of what is allegorically portrayed as the separation of Adam and Eve.
In the diagram of the Tree of Life on the right, the feminine (reflective) column is represented in the spheres of mind of Wisdom, Mercy and Intuition -- while the male spheres are represented in Understanding, Judgment and Logic. But just as important is the male sphere of the Heavenly Kingdom, and the feminine (reflective) sphere as represented in the Earthly Kingdom. Wholeness from a holograpic perspective can only be understood within the context of Jesus' reply when his disciples ask if they, as having become "children", will enter the Inner Kingdom of God -- i.e., Jesus said to them, "When you make the two one, and when you make the inside like the outside and the outside like the inside, and the above like the below, and when you make the male and the female one and the same, so that the male not be male nor the female female" (see Gospel Of Thomas Saying 22). In making the male not male, nor the female female -- wherein the paradoxical opposites are merged on a higher plane in Oneness -- the allegorical pattern of Adam and Eve which was separated in the Alpha, has been re-merged in the Omega of Creation. And from the perspective of this process of restoring the two divided and opposite polarities into a state of Oneness, is the version of this statement of man's ultimate reality that has been preserved at verse 12 of the 66th chapter in the Gospel Of The Nazirenes which proclaims: And one said to him, Teacher, when shall the Kingdom come? And he answered and said, When that which is without shall be as that which is within, and that which is within shall be as that which is without, and the male with the female, neither male nor female, but the two in One. They who have ears to hear, let them hear. And just as important is the reality that the Kingdom can only be entered when the twelve spheres of the Tree of Life are in perfect balance and wholeness -- and then entrance can only be made through the Center as Jesus explained in the 69th chapter of the Gospel of the Nazirenes: And one of the disciples asked him, "How shall a man enter into the Kingdom?" And he answered and said, "If you don't make below as the above, and the left as the right, and the behind as the before, entering into the center and passing into the spirit, you will not enter into the kingdom of God." In the diagram of the Tree of Life, the below (Earthly Kingdom) must be merged with the above (Heavenly Kingdom) -- the left (Eve feminine-reflective) column must be merged with the right (Adam), as well as the inner and outer -- all of which Duality must be brought together in the Center, in order to Enter the Kingdom of God. That this is a valid teaching that was removed by the fourth century Church of Constantine when they corrupted the scriptures (see BibleCorruption.com), is confirmed in the fact that it is also quoted in the Second Epistle of Clement where it states with respect to the Coming of the Kingdom (End Times): “Let us expect, therefore, hour by hour, the kingdom of God in love and righteousness, since we know not the day of the appearing of God. For the Lord Himself, being asked by one when His kingdom would come, replied, 'When two shall be one, that which is without as that which is within, and the male with the female, neither male nor female’”. Which confirms the teaching of Jesus that the Kingdom will never come upon the earth so as to be seen by men -- because it is within you. Therefore, man can only reach his Destiny in the Journey of the Soul when the Holographic Divine Patten with all its aspects within our mind and being is brought together in Absolute Oneness and Wholeness within the Center of our Being. That carnal men look for the Kingdom to come outwardly -- rejecting the statement of Jesus that the Kingdom can only come within -- is easily demonstrated in The Third Fatal Mistake on the Key Of Knowledge website.
What Is A Holographic Pattern? In the article, Are We Living In A Hologram it is stated that "The universe is a hologram and everything you can see - including this article and the device you are reading it on - is a mere projection. This is according to a controversial model proposed in 1997 by theoretical physicist Juan Maldacena. Until now the bizarre theory had never been tested, but recent mathematical models suggest that the mind-boggling principle could be true."
The properties of a hologram has often been portrayed in relationship of the Macrocosm to the microcosm -- meaning, the pattern of the Whole is replicated into each of the parts and fragments that make up the Whole. Another way of expressing this reality is in the words, as above, so below. But the very fact that modern physicists have presently confirmed the visionary warnings and perceptions of the Mystics -- many of whom authored the Jewish and Christian scriptures -- should come as a strong warning that what we see is only a replicated image of higher reality. And our true plight is enlightenly portrayed in the analogy of Plato's Cave -- which analogy parallels the Gospel portrayal of the "outer darkness" of mind and being (see Outer Darkness) -- which presents the exact same reality that all that we think we see "...is a mere projection" of a higher unseen reality that we are virtually blind to. In either case, the solution to the enigma is presented in the words of the Gospel of Thomas: Jesus said, "Recognize what is in your sight, and that which is hidden from you will become plain to you...". But perhaps even more important is the fact that when rightly understood, the analogy of Plato's Cave is in fact the pattern of a holographic reality that demonstrates how modern physicists have proven inadvertently proven the wisdom of the mystic to be correct.
In a holographic universe, the realm in which we presently dwell can be portrayed as a shadow-realty -- whereby the images we see and interact with are in fact projected images from a higher source realm that we cannot perceive with our physical senses. And thus, the analogy of Plato's Cave portrays mankind as prisoners who can only see shadow-images that are danced upon the wall of the cave -- with the objective being to escape the cave and enter the higher realm of reality that is the Source of the shadow-images. And while modern science has only now evolved to the level where they have become aware of the relationship of the holographic shadow-world to its Source, the true objective of all genuine religions has been to provide the knowledge that is necessary to escape the shadow-world and enter the higher reality of the Celestial Source. Thus, the reality portrayed by Astrophysicist Robert Jastrow, who was the head of NASA’s Goddard Institute for Space Studies wrote in his book, God and the Astronomers, that “The scientist has scaled the mountains of ignorance; he is about to conquer the highest peak; as he pulls himself over the final rock, he is greeted by a band of theologians who have been sitting there for centuries.” If the objective is to escape this shadow-world and gain entrance into the celestial source-realm, then it will have to be acknowledged that the only body of knowledge exists concealed within the allegorical text of the scriptures.
In order to rightly understand the dilemma of the Holographic Universe in which man presently finds himself, it is important to recognize the pros and cons of such a reality. Among the list of the pros is the reality that, if you understand the pattern which has been replicated into the present reality in which you are dwelling, then you can use this knowledge of the pattern to escape the limitations that constrict you. On the other hand, the cons of the holographic pattern is seen in the fact that on the surface, what you think you see appears to be complete within itself. Which is why Darwinism and the Theory of Evolution which is being taught as fact in our educational systems, has been proven to be in grave error by modern physicists, because it was based upon a finding that the world came into being without non-physical intervention or forces at work. When in reality, just the opposite is true. When rightly understood, what this means is that modern science has already confirmed the fact that the Spiritual Mystic -- many of whom authored our scriptures -- were correct, and Darwinism is dead wrong.
Science - Religion - And The Etheric Field/Mind: As stated in the foregoing, the Earthly Kingdom is a feminine reflective reality. The analogy of Plato's Cave (see Cave) portrays the images we see in the outer world as shadow-images. The Gospel account of Jesus portrays the shadow-images as the "outer darkness" of mind and being (see Outer Darkness) which those who failed to put on the required "wedding garment" were thrown into. And when rightly understood, the
"wedding garment of purity" is the merging of the male/female divisions within the mind and being of the seeker/disciple, with the Final Marriage being the merger of the soul to the Indwelling Logos. But the fact that modern physics has proven this vision of the mystic to be true, is of the utmost importance to all of mankind. That man in his "natural" organic state of mind only perceives the shadow-images -- which modern physicists portray as a "blemish" within the unseen Field -- and in his blindness, dwells in what Jesus portrayed as the
"outer darkness" of mind and being, while using different language and terminology, has already been proven by modern science. If we pose the question: What is the
"outer darkness" that Jesus made reference to in the case of those who failed to put on the required "wedding garment"? It is the inability of carnal man to perceive the source of the images of what he sees in the physical world. In the Gospel of Thomas it states: (113) His disciples said to him, "When will the kingdom come?" Jesus said, "It will not come by waiting for it. It will not be a matter of saying 'here it is' or 'there it is.' Rather, the kingdom of the father is spread out upon the earth, and men do not see it." Thus, one of the primary purposes of the Gospel teachings is to Open The Eyes Of The Heart so we can see the source of all things that man in his carnal condition is blind to.
Einstein made one of the most important observations that modern intellectuals neither understand, nor can they in any manner even begin to come to terms with. Einstein stated: "The intuitive mind is a sacred gift and the rational mind is a faithful servant. We have created a society that honors the servant and has forgotten the gift." Thus, the question? If Einstein is correct, then how does one set about developing the intuitive mind? Does one go to a traditional school environment that suppresses what Einstein portrays as the forgotten intuitive gift -- while programming the rational servant with what often amounts to little more than cultural and politically correct propaganda?
With great wisdom and vision Einstein stated "Only those who can see the invisible can do the impossible." But since the vast majority of modern scientists reject even the existence of the invisible -- promoting the position that only what you see with your physical senses is tangible and real -- it is the mainstream of the scientific community that has rendered itself impotent with respect to any real depth of perception and understanding. And from the religious side of the equation, the man known as the Apostle Paul conveyed the exact same message to the congregation of believers that Einstein stated in the words: "While we look not at the things which are seen, but at the things which are not seen: for the things which are seen are temporal; but the things which are not seen are eternal" (2 Cor 4:18 KJV) -- even going so far at to portray the literal perception of the scriptures which is championed by linear-thinking religious authorities, as the
"letter that killeth" (2 Cor 3:6). Thus, provoking the question: Is it possible to see beyond the limits of man's organic vision, and intuitively observe that which is unseen by the mind of natural organic man?
In his own words Einstein acknowledged that: “The only thing that interferes with my learning is my education.” In fact, what Einstein portrays as the rational servant does not even possess the necessary insight to understand both the reality of the intuitive gift, or the Great Source of Knowledge that the undeveloped intuitive resources of the mind of man has the innate potential of tapping into -- which prompted Einstein to acknowledge that “We can't solve problems by using the same kind of thinking we used when we created them.”
To man's own detriment, the above statements are largely ignored by the vast majority of linear-thinking scientists and their religious counterparts. Thus, the all-important question that modern man must come to terms with: Does an unseen dimension exist that the (suppressed) Intuitive Mind can tap into and obtain answers and important truths that the linear-intellectual mind is blind to? And if it does, what course of action must we take to develop the ability to perceive and tap into the unseen? If it is true that we are only seeing a very partial and fragmentary vision of our own true reality -- and it is within the scope of man's innate abilities to develop this facility of mind that enables the individual to perceive an unseen reality that is beyond the limits of man's undeveloped physical organic senses -- then how can we continue to ignore and do what suppresses the development of this important resource of mind and being? With respect to the invisible, when it is understood that what is being made reference to is a blindness that encompasses all of mankind in a condition that Jesus portrayed as the "outer darkness" of mind and being (see Outer Darkness) -- which is parallel to the analogy of the illusions of Plato's Cave that has entrapped mankind in a shadow-world that he does not understand the nature and reality of -- then the reality of these words spoken by both the scientist and the mystic becomes an obstacle that is imperative to overcome and prevail over its limitations. After all, we can't claim to know or understand anything, if we have so limited our vision of reality that we only see and observe a fragmentary perception of man's true reality.
The vast difference between what would be called the common knowledge of man, and the higher spiritual reality attested to by the mystic and visionary of man's distant past, has begun to be demonstrated by the modern scientific community. Quoting physicist Walter Thirring in his book, Urbausteine der Materie where he wrote about matter that modern physics “...has put our thinking about the essence of matter in a different context. It has taken our gaze from the visible - the particles - to the underlying entity, the field. The presence of matter is merely a disturbance of the perfect state of the field at that place; something accidental, one could almost say, a ‘blemish’. Accordingly, there are no simple laws describing the forces between elementary particles… Order and symmetry must be sought in the underlying field.” One of the primary realities that science has yet to come to terms with in order to advance beyond their present level, is the fact that physical matter is the result of the forces in the Etheric Field coming together -- causing what Walter Thirring above describes as a "blemish" that we observe with our organic physical senses. And what this is, is in fact Darwinism in reverse -- i.e., modern science has proven that the Field which is unseen and surrounds all matter, is in fact the Source which impresses the aspect of mind and consciousness into the forms of matter that we observe with our physical senses. But it will remain impossible for us to even begin to understand with any depth of comprehension what we see, so long as our vision remains alienated from the Source in the Field that is the causal factor.
What man has traditionally called knowledge, is the wisdom and understanding gained through his study of what Walter Thirring called the "blemish" -- i.e., the illusion of what we perceive as physical matter. What exactly is the physicist portraying as a
"blemish"? Man in his "natural" organic condition of mind can only see and understand from a three-dimensional perspective of reality -- and this causes the (shadow-images) of what man sees with his physical senses, to be an allegorical image that is representative of the (unseen) whole. This (allegorical) shadow-image is formed by the intersecting forces (positive/negative, male/female) in what the scientist has portrayed as the unseen (Etheric) Field. Therefore, without understanding the underlying forces in the Field that formed the "blemish" that organic man observes as concrete physical matter, it can be stated that what we observe in the physical world is so incomplete, that it would be virtually impossible to truly understand what we think and imagine we see. Which is why the Gospel of Thomas declares: (5) Jesus said, "Recognize what is in your sight, and that which is hidden from you will become plain to you."
Reality, states the physicist, can only be found in the (unseen Etheric) Field -- and it is the Field that both surrounds all physical forms that we observe with our body-senses -- and it is the unseen Field that is the source of what we perceive with our physical senses which we call matter. The analogy of Plato portrays what we see as shadow-images, because being three-dimensional and incomplete, they are allegorical in nature -- i.e., a symbol of the higher reality which exists as the Source in the Field. Which again, must be understood as Darwinism in reverse -- in that, Darwinism attempted to demonstrate that this physical world came into being apart from any unseen supernatural forces -- and modern science has now proven that this world is the direct result of unseen forces that would be defined as supernatural, or beyond what is seen with the physical senses. Which means that the statement that astrophysicist Robert Jastrow who was the head of NASA’s Goddard Institute for Space Studies wrote in his book, God and the Astronomers, has come to pass -- i.e., “The scientist has scaled the mountains of ignorance; he is about to conquer the highest peak; as he pulls himself over the final rock, he is greeted by a band of theologians who have been sitting there for centuries.” While modern science has proven the vision of the Mystic to be true, in order for the scientist to move beyond his present position, he must begin to consult and learn from the wisdom of the Mystic that is routinely taught in our modern systems of education. Therefore, it must be recognized that the allegorical shadow-images that we see in the outer world not only came into existence through the unseen forces in what the scientist portrays as the Field -- but that the shadow-images which we see, is totally dependent upon the Source in the unseen Field.
In defense of Darwin, it must be understood that in the same way that many unsolved crimes in the past are presently resolved through DNA, Darwin lived in the nineteenth century -- long before the most enlightening discoveries of modern quantum physics. And in recognition of this fact, Darwin himself questioned the inadequacy of his own conclusions. In the words of Niles Eldredge of the American Museum of Natural History: “The old explanation that the fossil record was inadequate is in itself an inadequate explanation.” Why? The fossil record is inadequate because everything that we see and perceive in this realm is directly caused by patterns of force being exerted upon matter from beyond the bounds of this three-dimensional world in which we presently dwell. And the fact that the fossil record failed to support Darwin's conclusions, is openly acknowledged in his own words where he wrote: "Why then is not every geological formation and every stratum full of such intermediate links? Geology assuredly does not reveal any such finely graduated organic chain, and this, perhaps, is the most obvious and gravest objection which can be urged against my theory" (Charles Darwin, On The Origin Of Species). According to Darwin's theory, the geological record should be full of species that are slowly increasing in complexity over time. Since evolution relies on time, chance, and incremental steps, sudden leaps are not possible -- which demonstrates that the fossil record itself directly contradicts the theory of evolution! And even if a proverbial missing link could be found, this would not in any manner negate the fact that it is the forces in the Etheric Field that has brought about all changes and variations of life-forms that we observe in the physical world.
Einstein experienced shock when he first came into contact with the new reality of atomic physics, and wrote in his autobiography: “All my attempts to adapt the theoretical foundation of physics to this [new type of] knowledge failed completely. It was as if the ground had been pulled out from under one, with no firm foundation to be seen anywhere, upon which one could have built”. In much the same fashion, the European physicist Niels Bohr stated that “…The great extension of our experience in recent years has brought to light the insufficiency of our simple mechanical conceptions and, as a consequence, has shaken the foundation on which the customary interpretation of observation was based.” These “…mechanical conceptions” make reference to Darwin and the theory of evolution. The crux of the problem that has limited man's thinking to that of the intellectual dark ages, is found in the statement that the mind of man sees only what he is prepared to comprehend! And that what we imagine we see is affected by our own thinking, is demonstrated in text of Itzhak Bentov’s book which reveals that: “The quantum theory asserts that there is no way one can measure some sets of things, like momentum and position, together very accurately... because the consciousness of the experimenter interacts with the experiment itself. Therefore, it becomes possible that the attitude of the experimenter must also influence the outcome of any particular experiment” (Preface to Stalking The Wild Pendulum, by Itzhak Bentov). Thus, we begin to contemplate the interrelatedness of mind and matter and the fact that the whole of our culture which is based totally upon a linear perception, is to the exclusion of what is observed and understood by the intuitive. Thus, resulting in the fact that our linear-based culture has become an obstacle to the advancement of mankind.
That there is an unseen connection between mind and matter, and man is able to consciously and unconsciously effect what we perceive as inanimate objects with his own patterns of thought, means that our present-day cultural and quasi-scientific perception of Creation itself is defective. The problem is that we can never start to embrace man’s true reality, until we begin to acknowledge and recognize that what we see is only a fragment of the whole picture of any given object -- and this is true not only from a religious doctrinal perspective, but a scientific one as well.
Robert Jastrow, an astrophysicist who heads NASA’s Goddard Institute for Space Studies, pointed out that the big bang is not exactly an explanation of cause. He is quoted in The Aquarian Conspiracy: “If a scientist really examines the implications, he would be traumatized. As usual, when the mind is faced with trauma, it reacts by ignoring the implications - in science this is called ‘refusing to speculate’ - or by trivializing the origin of the world by calling it the Big Bang, as if the universe were merely a firecracker”. Mr. Jastrow then continues and states: “Consider the enormousness of the problem: Science has proved that the universe exploded into being at a certain moment. It asks, what cause produced this effect? Who or what put the matter and energy into the universe? Was the universe created out of nothing or was it gathered together out of pre-existing materials? And science cannot answer these questions... It is not a matter of another year, another decade of work, another measurement, or another theory. At this moment it seems as though science will never be able to raise the curtain on the mystery of creation”.
In the realization that traditional scientific inquiry can never provide the answers to life, thoughtful physicists in greater number have begun to notice the curious parallels between their own findings and ancient mystical descriptions of reality -- mystical descriptions that have been totally dismissed by our modern linear-based culture. These similarities were pointed out in the book, The Tao Of Physics, by Fritjof Capra, and The Dancing Wu Li Masters by Gary Zukav. Zukav’s book takes its title from the Chinese expression for physics, wu li, which he translates as “patterns of organic energy”, and writes: “Bell’s theorem not only suggests that the world is quite different than it seems, it demands it. Something very exciting is happening. Physicists have ‘proved’ rationally that our rational ideas about the world in which we live are profoundly deficient”.
Bell’s theorem, which was proposed in 1964 by J.S. Bell, a physicist working in Switzerland, was first confirmed experimentally in 1972. Physicist Henry Stapp, in a 1975 federal report called it the most “profound discovery of science”. Bell’s theorem succeeds in exhibiting the bizarre nature of the subatomic world. Experiments show that if paired particles which are identical twins in their polarity fly apart, and the polarity of one is changed by an experimenter, the polarity of the other particle changes instantaneously. Thus, even though from a physical perspective the two particles appear to us as separate, it has been proven that the particles remain mysteriously connected regardless of the fact that there is no physical connection.
The esoteric reality that was proven and demonstrated in this experiment was portrayed as the most “profound discovery of science”, because it virtually proves everything that science presents in the classrooms throughout our educational systems today as being in profound error! Moreover -- and perhaps even more important -- is the fact that because we culturally build the child's thinking and mindset upon a fraudulent foundation, we inhibit their evolving minds from moving beyond a very counterfeit point in their perception of both themselves, and the world in which they presently dwell. Modern physicists have proven that the particles are connected in another non-physical dimension that is beyond man's organic vision to detect -- i.e., what in the above is portrayed as the Field. In the words of Einstein: “We may therefore regard matter as being constituted by the regions of space in which the field is extremely intense… There is no place in this new kind of physics both for the field and matter, for the field is the only reality” (quoted in M. Capek, The Philosophical Impact of Contemporary Physics). What this confirms is that reality is in the Field that is beyond the organic vision and senses of man -- and the physical world we perceive and interact with, is not only a result of this higher reality that we can't see with our physical eyes, but in many instances is an illusion that is controlled by our predisposed beliefs and philosophical opinions. Moreover, what this further confirms is that the Darwinist mindset that is presently taught in our schools is not only gravely wrong, but the error which our educational systems is programming young school children with, represents a vision and thought pattern that will inhibit them from understanding man's own higher reality that is manifest in the Field -- or the Etheric realms that the organic senses of the body cannot normally detect. And herein lies the crux of the problem as seen in the example of our educational systems which will promote grave error -- as seen in the fact that they present a totally false picture of both themselves, and the world -- totally failing to convey to the students that it has already been proven that the mind of man in it’s natural organic state is simply incapable of perceiving the far-reaching ramifications of man's higher reality of mind that is centered in the Etheric Field -- and even less prepared to comprehend the results of the intertwining connections that are maintained not only between individuals and groups of people, but between the past, the present, and future. What is portrayed in the above is merely science beginning to crack open the door to man's own higher reality -- a reality that he can only begin to grasp, by discarding almost everything that he presently thinks he knows.
That modern physics has proven the vision of the Mystic is a reality that few intellectuals have even begin to come to terms with. In his 1951 textbook on quantum theory, Bohm offered some interesting speculations on the analogies between the quantum processes and thought processes, thus carrying further the celebrated statement made by the astronomer James Jeans two decades earlier: “Today there is a wide measure of agreement… that the stream of knowledge is heading towards a non-mechanical reality; the universe begins to look more like a great thought than like a great machine”; and the statement by astronomer Arthur Eddington: “The stuff of the universe is mind-stuff”. Max Planck who is considered the founder of quantum theory stated: "As a man who has devoted his whole life to the most clear headed science, to the study of matter, I can tell you as a result of my research about atoms this much: There is no matter as such. All matter originates and exists only by virtue of a force which brings the particle of an atom to vibration and holds this most minute solar system of the atom together. We must assume behind this force the existence of a conscious and intelligent mind. This mind is the matrix of all matter." More recently, cyberneticist David Foster described “an intelligent universe” whose apparent concreteness is generated by cosmic data from an unknowable, organized source. The reality of the holographic theory says that: “…our brains mathematically construct hard reality by interpreting frequencies from a dimension transcending time and space. The brain is a hologram, interpreting a holographic universe.”
What does it mean that the Universe is not concrete matter in the manner that our brains interpret it -- but rather, the Universe is a "Great Thought"? What does it mean that
“…our brains mathematically construct hard reality by interpreting frequencies from a dimension transcending time and space. The brain is a hologram, interpreting a holographic universe”?
That what we are seeing is a holographic universe that is to a large part created within our own minds, is why the Gospel of Thomas declares: Jesus said, "Recognize what is in your sight, and that which is hidden from you will become plain to you . For there is nothing hidden which will not become manifest." Which statement provokes the question: If we begin to recognize what is in our sight, what exactly will begin to "...become plain" to our vision and understanding? In the February 1979 Psychology Today interview with brain scientist Karl Pribram, the world which he attempted to describe confirmed the vision witnessed by the ancient mystics and enlightened wise men -- and when their vision of man's reality is properly understood, confirmed the reality of the Bible that neither true believer nor staunch critic is even prepared to acknowledge and understand -- i.e., Pribram wrote: “It isn’t that the world of appearances is wrong; it isn’t that there aren’t objects out there, at one level of reality. It’s that if you penetrate through and look at the universe with a holographic system, you arrive at a different reality, one that can explain things that have hitherto remained scientifically inexplicable: paranormal phenomena… synchronicities, the apparently meaningful coincidence of events” (see Illusion ). And thus, it is this world of illusion that is created by the limitations of each person's own mind that limits the vision and understand of each individual person.